![[Screenshot: GNU Privacy Assistant - Privoxy source tarball loaded in file manager]](../../../bilder/screenshots/patched-gpa/GNU-Privacy-Assistant-Privoxy-source-tarball-loaded-in-file-manager.jpg "GNU Privacy Assistant - Privoxy source tarball loaded in file manager")
![[Screenshot: GNU Privacy Assistant - Detached signature found for Privoxy source tarball]](../../../bilder/screenshots/patched-gpa/GNU-Privacy-Assistant-Detached-signature-found-for-Privoxy-source-tarball.jpg "GNU Privacy Assistant - Detached signature found for Privoxy source tarball")
![[Screenshot: GNU Privacy Assistant - Signature for Privoxy source tarball verified]](../../../bilder/screenshots/patched-gpa/GNU-Privacy-Assistant-Signature-for-Privoxy-source-tarball-verified.jpg "GNU Privacy Assistant - Signature for Privoxy source tarball verified")
www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/screenshots/patched-gpa/
The screenshots were created while testing a gpa
patch to detect .asc signatures
(Submitted as Issue 1637).
Free software ftw.
Update 2014-05-05:As it turns out the patch also prevents a false negative when verifying the signature itself (unpatched gpa on the left).
![[Screenshot: Unpatched GNU Privacy Assistant claims valid Privoxy signature is bad]](../../../bilder/screenshots/patched-gpa/Unpatched-GNU-Privacy-Assistant-claims-valid-Privoxy-signature-is-bad.jpg "Unpatched GNU Privacy Assistant claims valid Privoxy signature is bad")
![[Foto: Patched GNU Privacy Assistant found proper Privoxy source tarball and shows a valid signature]](../../../bilder/screenshots/patched-gpa/Patched-GNU-Privacy-Assistant-found-proper-Privoxy-source-tarball-and-shows-a-valid-signature.jpg ": Patched GNU Privacy Assistant found proper Privoxy source tarball and shows a valid signature")